Wikipedia:y[W Wikipedia: segmentation and integration of the page

oT: t[STwEBLyfBAiWikipediajx Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Wikipedia),

y[Wm[gAy[WeB Notes on this page, consider the content on this page. evFumv` Examination of the contents of the summary: "notice" and the definition of

y[Wm[gAy[WeB Notes on this page, consider the content on this page. evFu^v Examination of the contents of the summary: "Integration should / should not be" revised if

EBLyfBA{lKChCB This document is the Japanese version of Wikipedia, the guidelines should be considered. p{IA]A jB Many people basically agree, and are encouraged to follow, the official policy is not. KvW\AXAm[gy[WB If necessary it is possible to edit it, but if you make major changes, the first page of notes to please the proposal.

V[gJbg : Shortcut: WP:MM WP: MM

y[WA1y[W2@A2y[W1@B On this page, the page one way to split into two, one to two page describes how to integrate. AAAe1@AAAy[Wy[W]L@B Also, in relation to the latter, posting one of history on how to put together, the two sides in relation to certain parts of the page to another page also explains how to transcribe.

EBLyfBALAQJA zI`WB Wikipedia's article, many of the participants to always be repeated correctionthe ideal completed form and evolve into a different direction it is not uncommon. OCi1A y[Wy[WB Means that one of the deflection, and the integration of pages and pages and splitting. AEsAEsILAIey[WEP[XoCP[XA m[gc_B In the following, you should split the integration and consolidation should not be split and if you are listed in the abstract, but that each page specifically whether the split is to be integrated KESUBAIKESU So, notebook in response to the debate are encouraged to decide.

y[W{A vAu[[y[WA]]vu[[y[WB]]vLqYB Integration or implementation of the page when you split a summary field, "[[Page A]] from the split" or "[[Page B]] integration" is to say, please do not forget to write. AuWpvA GFDL`B This procedure, "The Inheritance of editing history," is called, GFDL and obligations are interpreted. A NQfAeB Neglect this step, copyright infringement is determined, the post might be deleted.

[ W ] y[W [Editorial page split

[ W ] should be split if

• y[WASs The bloated size of the page, so the overall outlook for the poor readers, if inconvenient
• y[WAoX Only in the pages of certain amount of explanation, obviously, if you are in the balance day
• osvLqASTLp No word as a headline description of the commentary, but as an encyclopedia of useful information if

[ W ] you should not be split

• AoX^u Split as a result of either or both the stub will be
• 1 One of the information should be organized
• y[W32LoCgWxoA TCYRB The amount of pages to more than 32 kilobytes and will edit the screen warning, because only the size of the split may not be. AAlB However, as a preliminary indication, the split is worth considering.

[ W ] m proposal split announcement

uvy[WAKChC]mB "If the split should" agree to find a page, follow these guidelines, please disclose the proposed split.

1. y[W {{ }} ev[g\tB The split of the top of the page ((split proposal)) template attached. ev[ggTemplate:QB For more information on how to use a template Template: Split proposal, please refer to.
2. Km[gy[WA|AB Notes the appropriate page, to explain the purpose of the proposed split,RIMASU opinion.
3. WmA Wikipedia:eL|sB Editors more to get to know, Wikipedia: split proposal to include suggestions to make the call.

AEEjAwm[geB Proposal to split the opposition's policy should be the next item if you have an opinion on the proposal specified by Notebook from the post. XsB So those suggestions and opinions, including those adjustments. 1ToApmApc_NAQlsB One week after the proposal passed, it is clear from other users do not have a dissenting opinion, or other users, and you prevent a discussion on the division of the following steps to help the process of splitting Please. y[WeAmO]B Split to treat the content of the page number and in proportion to the size and depth of the well-known for a long period of time is appropriate to take. \Ac_A`wB If any comments after the split is announced, and they quickly moved to the discussion, please strive to reach a consensus.

c_nA_c_r~Aptev[g\Ac_~iej1oAsB Discussion began with the opposition, but still can not reach a conclusion was stopped in the middle of discussions if it continues to accept the opinions of users to paste the template will continue, but that stopped discussed Since (the last time the Post's opinion) more than a month after it disappears if the proposal was split, split the files. AMECsK\B This is modified by subsequent split is inappropriate because there is a possibility. ]AmIsB If you do not split the procedure, the notice to quit, please do. KvvAB Still need to be split if the proposal again and again, please.

[ W ] split step

y[WbLqAVKy[WAB Gap-page description of some of the new procedure for the page and the tenant, is as follows.

1. bIeTB Post time gap before the end of the leave. [J^CA EW (UTC) i {W9jZB Local time setting is the world's standard time (UTC) (Japan standard time from nine hours Subtract), please convert.
2. bW : ANB Editing Gap: the removal of parts to be separated, and to replace it creates a link to the tenant. Aev[gB At the same time, the split proposal to remove the template. vu[[]]vLqB Summary box "[[B]] to a split" is described.
3. VK : bARs[&y[XgB Create a new tenant: the removal of parts from the Gap, just copy and paste. vu[[b]]vLqB Summary box: "[[Gap]] from the split," is described. A NQfAeB Neglect this step, copyright infringement is determined, the post might be deleted. vAGFDL`A1. TAM5lxLAu[[b]] 200xNxxxx xx:xx (UTC) (MF x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)vB The format of the summary page, GFDL is not on duty, 1. At the time left before the split of the original version and the lead author of five people listed, "[[Gap]] 200x xx, xx month , Xx: xx (UTC) from the division (lead author: x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) "and it is recommended.
4. X^CC : Wikipedia:X^C}jAQl`LAAL`B Modify the style of B: Wikipedia: Manual of style at the beginning of the article to help write the name in bold, and give a reading that, as a form of independence forEMASU article. AbWLqAbNuB Also, to describe the relationship between gap and the gap will be set up to link to. AKXA JeSNB In addition, from time to time, categories and languages link to add.
5. bN_CNgC : NmFAAy[WbNA d_CNgNhQld_CNgNKXCB Links and redirected to instep of the fix: the original link to see the result of splitting the gap in other pages link to be funny, and not a double redirect and to prevent broken links and a double to help redirect If you want to link cause and the appropriate fix. CKvm[gB If you have a big need of revision, cooperate in a note to try to please.
6. Wikipedia:YLA|LB Wikipedia: Split proposal that the statement is true, the split was made to add a postscript to report the results of that.

3. 4. AWmAK2iKsB 3. And 4. The division of work and editing process to clarify the distinction, to be divided into two stages, please do.

[ W ] step if you do not split

c_ic_~jAAmIsB The results of the discussion (or because of mere discussion), the split was not able to agree on, you do notice, please quit.

1. y[W\tev[gB Affixed to the page template to remove the proposed split.
2. m[gAuvLB Notes, the "division of the agreement were not immediately available," such as a description of the respondent.
3. Wikipedia:YLA|LB Wikipedia: Split proposal that the statement is true, the split was made to add a postscript to report the results of that.

[ W ] Notes

• 1lpLAYpAvLsGFDLB But the copyright to split part of one if the user has the use of such a split on the occasion of this column in the summary of stuff is not a violation of the GFDL. vLB But even in this case are listed in the summary section is recommended. AppF\B This is the history of other users erroneously identified a violation of inheritance may be.

• A1sB If multiple destination division of the one at a time, please try to do. A vAxLApKvvAAIB This summary section of the characters is limited, so many stories at once to trying to split the history of inheritance Summarized required to write a column may lose, and specifically how each part To be divided or to obfuscate.

[ W ] y[W the integration of the page

[ W ] you should be integrated

• TOAsAy[W About the same things and concepts, such as careless, aka if the page was made
• 1y[WAKvy[W One explanation of the page should be together in spite of the need to be chopped more pages if you have made
• _X^uL A common point Stubbing If you have multiple posts

[ W ] you should not be integrated

• sK If you return an inappropriate division

  o[gB revert to deal with and please delete.

• 2y[WS No two pages contain the same information if not the only

  B until there is no integration. _CNgB Please redirected to the other.

[ W ] m announcement of the proposed integration

uvy[WAKChC]mB "If the integration should" agree to find a page, follow these guidelines, please disclose the proposed integration.

1. y[WAy[Wcm {{ }} ev[g\tB Integration of each of the top of the page, a page of either integration or leave is not clear if the ((integration proposal)) template attached. m {{ Mergefrom }} {{ Mergeto }} ev[g\tB If you have a clear ((Mergefrom)) and ((Mergeto)) template attached. ev[ggA Template: A Template:Mergefrom A Template:MergetoQB For more information on the use of templates, Template: integration proposal, Template: Mergefrom, Template: Mergeto please see.
2. Km[gy[WA|AB Notes the appropriate page, to explain the purpose of the proposed integration,RIMASU opinion.
3. WmA Wikipedia:eL|sB Editors more to get to know, Wikipedia: integration proposal to include suggestions to make the call.

AEy[W\Ey[WUAjAwm[geB Proposal, while the combined opposition of the configuration of the page and other pages, such as filtering, if you have an opinion on the policy of the proponent to posts in the specified notebook. XsB So those suggestions and opinions, including those adjustments. 1ToApmApc_NAQlsB One week after the proposal passed, it is clear from other users do not have a dissenting opinion, or other users, and you prevent a discussion on the integration of the following steps to help the process of integration Please. y[WeAmO]B The number of pages dealing with integration and proportional to the size of the contents, and to disseminate information regarding the desired period will take a long time. \Ac_A`wB If the integration after the opinion expressed by some, the discussion quickly moved to the other, please strive to reach a consensus.

c_nA_c_r~Aptev[g\Ac_~iej1oAsB Discussion began with the opposition, but still can not reach a conclusion was stopped in the middle of discussions if it continues to accept the opinions of users to paste the template will continue, but that stopped discussed Since (the last time the Post's opinion) 1 integration month or more after you were extinguished as the proposal itself, the integration of files. AMECsK\B This is modified by subsequent integration is inappropriate because there is a possibility. ]AmIsB If you do not integrate the steps in accordance with the notice to quit, please do. KvvAB Still need to be integrated if the proposal again and again, please.

[ W ] steps of integration

y[Wby[W1Ay[WbAB Gap-Eul pages and pages into a single page, and if the gap procedure, is as follows.

1. IeTB From the last tenant to leave ahead of time. [J^CAEW (UTC) ZB Local time is setting the world standard time (UTC) Please conversion.
2. _CNg : WJALqAGfB^TAu#REDIRECT [[b]]vuAvu[[b]]vLqB And the tenant redirect: Open the editor of the tenant, the tenant described in the editor after the other before, "# REDIRECT [[Gap]]" is replaced by the abstract field, "[[Gap]] to integrate "Description.
3. b : 2.TLqbRs[&y[XgB Integration into the Gap: 2. Instep with a description of tenant before the end of the copy and paste. vu[[]]vLqB Summary box: "[[B] integration" is described. A NQfAeB Neglect this step, copyright infringement is determined, the post might be deleted. vAGFDL`A1. TAM5lxLAu[[]] 200xNxxxx xx:xx (UTC) (MF x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)vB The format of the summary page, GFDL is not on duty, 1. In the time ahead, as well as integration with the original version of Lord of the five authors noted, "[[B]] 200x xx, xx, xx month : xx (UTC) and integration (lead author: x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) "and it is recommended.
4. bC : b1LqK`B Gap's fix: a single-gap as described in the appropriate manner once again. oA`LAInterwikiJeSdASIB Create a subhead or the tenant was a bold beginning part of the name and read the old stories, or erase, Interwiki and eliminate duplication of categories, such as the general adjustment. Aev[gsB At this time, will integrate the proposed removal of the template.
5. b_CNgC : d_CNgQlNmFAd_CNgKXCB Redirected to instep and the tenant of the fix: Do not double redirection to refer to check for other links, a double redirection occurs from time to time to fix. CKvWikipedia:BotAm[gvB If you need a large amount of correction in case of Wikipedia: Bot work to a request to consider the request and asked the cooperation of notes and try to please.
6. Wikipedia:YLA|LB Wikipedia: integration of the proposal that the statement is true, that integration was made to append the results of the report.

3.4.AWmA2iKsB 3. And 4. The integration process and make a clear distinction between editorial work, divided into two stages, please do.

y[WALqe1A2. AveAu[[]] 200xNxxxx xx:xx (UTC) NXM v`LqB Page tenant, areas of integration should be written only one history post does not exist, 2.'s When the summary of the field to add author's name, "[[B]] 200x, March xx xx, xx: xx (UTC) who authored the integration of people, "written in the form. AB This allows the integration of history can be substituted. sAKvB In this way the integration process, the integration of history does not need to be asked.

[ W ] If you do not step integration

c_ic_~jAAmIsB The results of the discussion (or, for the mere discussion), was not able to agree on integration, you do notice, please quit.

1. y[W\tev[gB Integrated attached to the page proposal to remove the template.
2. m[gAuvLB Notes for the "integration of the agreement were not immediately available," such as a description of the respondent.
3. Wikipedia:YLA|LB Wikipedia: integration of the proposal that the statement is true, that integration was not made to append the results of the report.

[ W ] V The new integration

y[Wby[WAy[WAAy[WALsB B-gap and the integration of the page to page, the page if you want to hei, first, to be one of the main page and navigate to C after the above steps of integration.

[ W ] Notes

• ALANQRmFB Prior to integration, integration in this article, copyright infringement and remove the problem and there is no reason to determine whether it is recommended. LAeALB Integration of the article in question, the issue of the integration until after the stories have a particular version will be obliged to remove.

• vAxLApKvvB Summarized below are the limited number of characters, so many stories at once to trying to integrate, and inherited history in the field required to write a summary may lose. 2.sB If the integration of the two steps. Several times to please.

• _CNgcB Integration after the integration of integration from the original target remains to be redirected, please note that. p GFDL v_CNgcKv B GFDL history of the inheritance to meet the requirements of the redirection of items you need to leave. _CNgijB Non-redirect (separate items), is not a problem that can not be removed. A_CNgKlB See the original name of integration, as integration where appropriate to consider whether redirected, please. sKAsOKB If an incorrect item name, you carry integration before they changed the name to the appropriate item, please.

[ W ] ]L posting some items

y[WbAy[W]LAbAB Gap, a portion of the page, the page you post to the tenant, a division of Gap, the tenant is the same as for the integration. ]Lvy[WAKChC]]LmB I should be posting some of you find a page, according to the following guidelines to notice some suggestions, please post.

1. ]L]L]Ly[W {{ ]L }} ev[g\tB Posting of posting some of the source and target of each of the top of the page ((Some posting)) template attached. ev[ggA Template:]LQB For more information on the use of templates, Template: some posting, please refer to.
2. A`AQl]LsB The proposed split proposal in accordance with the integration and consensus-building process after the other, the following steps to help, please do some posting. AeL|Wikipedia:sB However, the proposal calls for describing the Wikipedia: Split proposal, please go. Wikipedia:Wikipedia:|KvB Wikipedia: Split Proposal and Wikipedia: integration of the proposal do not need to call on both.

[ W ] ]L posting some of the steps

y[WbAy[W]LAB Gap, a portion of the page, the page you post to step B, is as follows.

1. bIeTB Post time gap before the end of the leave. [J^CAEW (UTC) ZB Local time is setting the world standard time (UTC) Please conversion.
2. bW : GfB^TB Gap editing: editors segregation and other parts to be removed before the leave. At]Lev[gB In addition, the proposal was added at the time of posting some of the proposals to remove the template. AKvNB Also, if necessary, creates a link to the tenant. vu[[]]]LvLqB Summary box: "[[B]] to post some," is described.
3. W : 2.LqAy[WRs[&y[XgB Edit B: 2. In the definition of rejection, the tenant at the end of the page to copy and paste. vu[[b]] ]LvLqB Summary box: "[[Gap]] from posting some" is described. A NQfAeB Neglect this step, copyright infringement is determined, the post might be deleted. vAGFDL`A1. TAM5lxLAu[[b]]xxxxNxxxx xx:xx (UTC) ]L (MF x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)vB The format of the summary page, GFDL is not on duty, 1. In the time ahead, along with the original version and split the five main authors of the statement, "[[Gap]] xxxx xx, xx month, xx: xx (UTC) posting some of the (lead author: x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) "and it is recommended.
4. : Rs[&y[XgA{KAOqMCAAotALqB The tenant of the integration: the end of copy and paste the appropriate parts of the body moved around to writing and lead to expanded or modified, or put a subhead, and to describe the integration To adjust. \LKvB A unified notation may be required might be. At]Lev[gB In addition, at the time of proposed posted some additional proposals to remove the template.

3.4.A]LWmA2iKsB 3. And 4. The posting process and make a clear distinction between editorial work, divided into two stages, please do.

[ W ] ]L If you do not posting some of the steps

c_ic_~jA]LAsB The results of the discussion (or, for the mere discussion), was not part of the posting, the following processing.

1. y[W\t]Lev[gAB Some proposals were attached to the posting page template, and removes all.
2. m[gAu]LvLB Notes, "some of the posting could not be reached agreement" as a description of the respondent.
3. Wikipedia:YLA]L|LB Wikipedia: Split proposal that the statement is true, some made by posting the results of that report was not recordable.

[ W ] the integration of history

y[WA@\gpRs[&y[XgAB And the integration of the page and move without using copy and paste when you move in, the integration of history may be better. sB The integration of history can not be done only by administrators. AAB Also, if you combine history, is difficult to undo.

[ W ] If history should be integrated

• y[W_CNgy[WARiejA After the integration of the page you are redirected to a page, but for some reason (along with author) will be removed, or if you have a high risk
• Rs[&y[XgLped Copy and paste to move after being stacked useful if the author

[ W ] Kv of history if you do not need to integrate

• ALp1 The integration is useful if you only have one history

  y[WvAeeLB page summary of the field, during Integration, the Post stated time and the author's name, please deal with that.

• y[WenIdA From the page to try to integrate the time-series in history have so many overlapping areas, the combined If the history of confusion
• Rs[&y[XgAOLp Copy and paste that was moved by the history and other useful if you do not

  y[WXA_CNgy[Wo[gARs[&y[Xgy[WA@\gpB change the name of the page in this case, you are redirected to revert to the original page, copy and paste made of moving on to remove a page, use the Move feature.

[ W ] request history of integration

1. y[WAARs[&y[XgA Wikipedia:_CNgB After the integration of the page, or copy and paste to move after the discovery, Wikipedia: Votes for deletion redirect the request to the integration of history.
2. AfAsB As an administrator, ask to see the integration of history and determine if you should immediately step in the history of the next section of the integration process. fAAAey[Wm[gbB History should not be judged integration, or if you can not debate, discuss each page, please note.

• sB Integration and execution of the request of another person that will be.
• A(1) (2) sAOA(1) (2) `vZXs (3) s B In principle, (1) request (2) run integrated administrator, and exceptions, (1) request (2) to the administrator of the transition process through consensus-building (3) run integrated administrator.

[ W ] The history of integration steps

sB Only history will be integrated to the administrator. Help:}jA QB The procedures Help: History Book integration manager, please refer to.

[ W ] Notes

• LpoB To integrate both the original and integration as a useful item if there is a history can not be integrated. AAKvcB In the history of the integration, integration in the history of the original item integration to move ahead and the need to integrate the formercSENAI is history. KvOW]LAlB If such a need to integrate the history of the state before the rollback to a specific version of edits to remove the posting after the re-start work or asked to replicate history to please consider.